AI Visibility Fixer

Sample report

Human-Reviewed AI Visibility Audit

See exactly what a manually verified audit looks like before you buy one.

This is a demonstration of the format and depth of a Human-Reviewed AI Visibility Audit. It is not a client engagement.

01 / Executive summary

Current production, manually verified

Website
AI Visibility Fixer
Inspection date
September 7, 2026
Primary URL
https://www.aivisibilityfixer.com/
Secondary URL
https://www.aivisibilityfixer.com/implementation-help
Review type
Automated audit plus manual raw-HTML and rendered-DOM verification
Priority findings
3 manually verified improvements

The checked pages are technically accessible and have a strong machine-readable foundation. The automated scans raised no review items, while manual review identified three clarity and trust improvements that deterministic checks do not fully judge.

02 / Scope

What was inspected

  • +Homepage raw HTML and rendered DOM
  • +One key conversion page
  • +Canonical URLs and heading structure
  • +JSON-LD detection and parsing
  • +robots.txt, sitemap.xml, and llms.txt
  • +Automated technical and content-readiness audits
  • +Manual false-positive review

03 / Verified positives

What already looks good

PASS / Canonical URLs

Both checked pages use self-referencing canonicals on the preferred www domain.

PASS / Valid JSON-LD

Organization, WebSite, WebApplication, WebPage, and FAQPage data parsed successfully on the homepage.

PASS / Clear primary headings

Each checked page has one visible H1, with no hidden responsive duplicate detected.

PASS / Public discovery files

robots.txt, sitemap.xml, and llms.txt all returned HTTP 200 during inspection.

PASS / Qualified claims

The site states that its checks do not guarantee crawling, indexing, ranking, citation, or recommendation.

04 / Priority findings

Evidence, meaning, and repair direction

FINDING 01

P1

Homepage headline promise vs. observable scope

Evidence
The visible H1 is “Why AI isn’t recommending your website?” The tools inspect readiness signals; they do not query AI platforms to observe recommendations.
What we verified
The H1 appears once in both raw HTML and the rendered DOM. This is a positioning issue, not a missing- or duplicate-heading issue.
Why it matters
A visitor could read the headline as a diagnosis of actual recommendations or mentions. More precise wording reduces expectation mismatch.
Recommended change
Describe technical and content readiness in the primary promise, rather than implying that recommendations were directly observed.

FINDING 02

P1

Quick scored checker vs. unscored Full Audit distinction

Evidence
The homepage presents a 100-point readiness inspection, while the Full AI Visibility Audit reports category-level PASS, WARNING, INFO, and COULD NOT CHECK results without an aggregate score.
What we verified
Both tools are separate and operational. The finding concerns how visitors choose between them, not either tool’s calculation logic.
Why it matters
Without a short explanation, users may treat the quick score as the definitive site-wide result or wonder why the full audit reports differently.
Recommended change
Label the homepage inspection as a quick signal check and the Full Audit as a transparent category-by-category technical review.

FINDING 03

P2

Commercial trust, operator, and policy information

Evidence
The paid Implementation Help page is public, but the checked site does not currently provide visible About, Contact, Privacy, or Terms destinations at the conventional routes reviewed.
What we verified
The relevant routes returned 404 during the inspection, and no corresponding links were present in the checked page navigation or footer.
Why it matters
Before paid work, visitors benefit from knowing who operates the service, how to make contact, and which terms apply. This is a trust issue, not an AI ranking factor.
Recommended change
Add truthful operator and contact information first, then publish policies that match the real payment and data-handling workflow.

05 / Before & after

Make the promise match the measurement

Current

Why AI isn’t recommending your website?

Recommended direction

Is your website ready for AI search?

Supporting copy

Check the technical and content signals that help search engines and AI systems access, interpret, and extract information from your pages.

This is a promise-accuracy recommendation, not a prediction of conversion, ranking, or citation performance.

06 / Action plan

Recommended order of work

  1. P1

    Align the homepage promise

    Describe readiness rather than observed AI recommendations.

  2. P2

    Clarify the audit paths

    Explain the quick score and unscored Full Audit at the choice point.

  3. P3

    Strengthen commercial trust

    Add truthful operator, contact, and policy information.

07 / Free vs. human

What manual review adds

Immediate signal check

Free Automated Audit

  • +Immediate
  • +One public page at a time
  • +Deterministic technical and content signals
  • +General recommended actions
  • +No manual DOM interpretation

$49 launch price

Human-Reviewed Audit

  • +Homepage plus one key page
  • +Raw HTML compared with rendered DOM
  • +Automated findings manually verified
  • +False positives removed
  • +Up to 3 prioritized findings
  • +Site-specific recommendations
  • +One concrete Before / After
  • +Delivered within 3 business days

08 / Human workflow

Why not just use ChatGPT?

General AI chat can explain SEO and schema concepts, review information you provide, and suggest ideas.

A Human-Reviewed Audit checks the current public production pages, records actual evidence, compares raw and rendered behavior, verifies parser output, removes false positives, and prioritizes a small number of site-specific changes.

The difference is the verification workflow—not a claim that human review can predict rankings or AI citations.

09 / Limits

What this audit does not tell you

  • It does not query AI platforms.
  • It does not calculate citation probability.
  • It does not guarantee crawling or indexing.
  • It does not guarantee AI recommendations or citations.
  • It does not guarantee rankings or predict traffic or revenue.
  • It does not replace legal, security, accessibility, or comprehensive SEO review.

Human-reviewed audit

Launch price: $49

  • Homepage + one key page
  • Up to 3 prioritized findings
  • One concrete Before / After
  • Delivered within 3 business days
Request a Human Audit — $49

Scope is confirmed before payment. No checkout occurs on this page. Implementation, calls, and ranking, traffic, citation, or recommendation guarantees are not included.